Comments on: iPod touch Should Be iPod PDA! http://www.twistermc.com/blog/2007/09/05/ipod-touch Like a Themepark of random information. Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:51:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Thomas http://www.twistermc.com/blog/2007/09/05/ipod-touch#comment-161187 Thomas Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:43:58 +0000 http://www.twistermc.com/blog/2007/09/05/ipod-touch#comment-161187 My understanding is that flash memory is small correct? If so, why couldn't they put a few in? I'm sure Apple thought of that though and there is probably design limitations. :) My understanding is that flash memory is small correct? If so, why couldn’t they put a few in?

I’m sure Apple thought of that though and there is probably design limitations. :)

]]> By: BigTom3007 http://www.twistermc.com/blog/2007/09/05/ipod-touch#comment-161130 BigTom3007 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:20:19 +0000 http://www.twistermc.com/blog/2007/09/05/ipod-touch#comment-161130 The iPod Touch runs of 16GB only because it is not Apple's fault is only because of the limitions of technology. The 16GB runs on Flash Memory not hard drive and the 16GB is the biggest only mass produced flash on the market. Which also means Apple should be coming out with a 16GB iPhone soon. The iPod Touch runs of 16GB only because it is not Apple’s fault is only because of the limitions of technology.

The 16GB runs on Flash Memory not hard drive and the 16GB is the biggest only mass produced flash on the market.

Which also means Apple should be coming out with a 16GB iPhone soon.

]]>